Overview
The GPOBA Working Paper Series is a forum
for presenting topics related to output-based
aid approaches that may help in enhancing
the design of future OBA projects. The series
will focus on the infrastructure and social
services sectors, but may also include papers
that are non-sector specific.
The forum is
intended to be a relatively informal and
efficient way to discuss relevant OBA design
issues. The conclusions presented in each
working paper are those conclusions of the
authors, and do not necessarily represent the
views of GPOBA or its donors.
Working Papers:
- Designing OBA When There is an Incumbent (November 2004)
Designing OBA When There is an Incumbent (PDF, 0.88MB)
- OBA Payment Mechanisms and Risk Mitigation (December 2004)
OBA Payment Mechanisms and Risk Mitigation (PDF, 1.34 MB)
- Credit Enhancing Output-based Aid (January 2005)
This working paper presents options for using World Bank guarantee instruments
to enhance the creditworthiness of government OBA payments to an infrastructure
service provider. OBA payments are targeted, performance-based subsidies
provided when full cost recovery through direct user fees is not justified due
to externalities, not possible due to affordability con straints, or not
practical due to the high costs of levying such fees. The main focus of the
paper is not on the policy aspects of subsidy provision, but on the use of OBA
payments as one element of a cash flow for project financing, the other element
being user fee payments. Structured in the right way, OBA payments can be made
creditworthy and can make infrastructure transactions financeable in the market
place. In many countries, government payments are not considered reliable and
are assigned a low credit rating by financial markets and investors. In these
cases, the quality of OBA payments needs to be enhanced, i.e. lifted to a higher
level, if they are to become a creditworthy component of a project?s cash flow.
World Bank guarantee instruments can be used to achieve this objective. The two
principal options are partial risk guarantees to mitigate government payment
risks for individual projects, and partial credit guarantees to enable
governments to mobilize funding for a subsidy pool that would provide OBA
payments to multiple projects.
Credit Enhancing Output-based Aid (PDF, 0.70 MB)
- What is OBA? Supporting Infrastructure Delivery
Through Explicit and Performance-based Subsidies (March 2005)
Increasing access to basic infrastructure and
social services is critical to reducing poverty and
achieving the Millennium Development Goals.
However, this is a challenge because of the gap
between what it costs to deliver a desired level
of service and what can be funded through user
charges. Subsidies have often played a role in
funding this gap because of, for example,
limited ability to pay by the poor. However,
given the political commitment by a number of
countries to increase aid flows, but at the same
time the mounting concern of aid effectiveness,
it is critical that subsidies be linked to the
actual delivery of services, or "outputs."
Output-based aid (OBA) is a strategy for using
explicit performance-based subsidies to deliver
basic services where policy concerns would
justify public funding to complement or replace
user fees.
What is OBA? Supporting Infrastructure Delivery
Through Explicit and Performance-based Subsidies (PDF, 0.98 MB)
- Techniques for estimating the fiscal costs and risks of
long-term output-based payments (June 2005)
Long-term commitments to make output-based
payments for infrastructure can encourage
private investors to provide socially valuable
services. Making good decisions about such
commitments is difficult, however, unless the
government understands the fiscal costs and
risks of possible commitments. Considering
voucher schemes, shadow tolls, availability
payments, and access, connection, and consumption
subsidies, this paper considers
measures of the fiscal risks of such commitments,
including the excess-payment probability
and cash-flow-at-risk. Then it illustrates
techniques, based on modern finance theory,
for valuing payment commitments by taking
account of the timing of payments and their
risk-characteristics. Although the paper is
inevitably mathematical, it focuses on practical
applications and shows how the techniques can
be implemented in spreadsheets.
Techniques for estimating the fiscal costs and risks of
long-term output-based payments (PDF, 1.04 MB)
- Lessons Learned in Infrastructure Services Provision: Reaching the Poor
(April 2006)
A key measure of the effectiveness of public spending on
infrastructure is the extent to which it benefits poor people.
In recent years policymakers and development practitioners have
increasingly sought to understand why earlier approaches to
infrastructure development often bypassed the poor or proved
unsustainable. That work has led to revisions in policies,
programs, and processes within the World Bank Group and in
the countries it serves, aimed at doing more to extend the
reach of infrastructure services to poor households and small
enterprises. Read more from the working paper series, Lessons
Learned in Infrastructure Services Provision: Reaching the Poor.
Lessons Learned in Infrastructure Services Provision: Reaching the Poor
(PDF, 209KB)
- Connecting Residential Households to Natural Gas: An Economic & Financial Analysis (April 2006)
The natural gas market has changed considerably in Egypt
the country has evolved as a major international gas exporter.
Industrial customers in the domestic market are increasingly
relying on natural gas to meet their energy needs. Natural
gas is already used as a major source of energy and feedstock
in the power, fertilizer, and petrochemicals sectors. The country
now has a well-developed high-pressure transmission network
in Nile Delta to supply industrial load. This paper aims to
analyze the overall macro- and micro-economic costs and benefits
of switching residential households to natural gas.
Connecting Residential Households to Natural Gas: An Economic & Financial Analysis (PDF, 1.04 MB)
- Regulation of water and sanitation services: getting better service to poor people (June 2006)
OBA approaches to improving water and sanitation service can work in a varietyof circumstances. Such OBA schemes require an understanding of the impact ofexisting regulatory arrangements have on water services to poor customers. Thedesign of OBA schemes should therefore include an evaluation of the existingregulatory arrangement in order to identify what changes could potentially bemade in order to get better services to poor people.
Regulation of water and sanitation services: getting better service to poor people (PDF, 0.71 MB)
Output-based Aid in Cambodia: Getting Private Operators and Local Communities to Help Deliver Water to the Poor - The Experience to Date (April 2008)
The OBA pilot in small towns in Cambodia, funded by the World Bank, was one of the first OBA water supply pilots to be initiated. The project was initially hailed as a success, but has not to date delivered the expected results, especially in terms of private sector leveraging. The reasons for this are various and include deficiencies in the contractual arrangements and bidding processes/variables, and the lack of capacity of the operators. This working paper provides insights into the initial lessons learned from the OBA pilot which are particularly interesting because of the possible comparison with more input-based schemes ("Design Build Lease" arrangements) undertaken at the same time and also funded by the World Bank.
Output-based Aid in Cambodia: Getting Private Operators and Local Communities to Help Deliver Water to the Poor - The Experience to Date (PDF, 1,013 KB)
|